| |
|
|
| |
 |
|
| |
|
| What is Spam? |
| More>> 28 Aug 2005 12:22 |
|
| Welcome to Arovax Community Forum! |
| More>> 22 Aug 2005 15:39 |
|
| Arovax NoSpam 2.0 has been released |
| More>> 21 Aug 2005 05:21 |
|
| Bulk mailer convicted of data theft scam |
| More>> 17 Aug 2005 00:59 |
|
| Former 'Spam King' pays MS $7m to settle lawsuit |
| More>> 17 Aug 2005 00:49 |
|
| UK regulator wants powers to stop the spammers |
| More>> 17 Aug 2005 00:34 |
|
| VXers release 'London bombing' Trojan |
| More>> 17 Aug 2005 00:28 |
|
| Net radio station silenced after phishing bust |
| More>> 17 Aug 2005 00:23 |
|
| Microsoft sues German spammer |
| More>> 17 Aug 2005 00:16 |
|
| $2m raised to combat spit |
| More>> 16 Aug 2005 23:58 |
|
|
|
 |
| Arovax NoSpam Technology |
Arovax NoSpam will attempt to classify incoming email messages
as 'spam'. This means you can have spam automatically filed away in a SPAM
mail folder, where it won't interrupt your email reading. First Arovax NoSpam
must be trained by each user to identify spam and non-spam. In simple words, you should show Arovax NoSpam an email that you like and an email you don't like (spam).
Arovax NoSpam will then analyze emails for clues as to what makes the spam and
non-spam emails different. For example: different words, differences in the
mailer headers and content style. The system then uses these clues to examine
new messages.
For instance, the word "Nigeria" often appears in spam, so you could use a spam filter which identifies anything containing this word as spam. But what if your business involves writing a guidebook on Nigerian Wildlife Conservation? Clearly a more flexible approach is necessary. Additionally spammers will adapt their content over time and will no longer use the word "Nigeria" (or the words "Lose Weight Fast", or any of other common lines). Ideally, the software should be able to adapt as the spam changes.
So, that is what Arovax NoSpam does. It compares the spam and the non-spam and calculates probabilities. For instance, the word "weight" almost never occurs in legitimate email, but it occurs all the time in “lose weight fast” spam. Arovax NoSpam can then look through incoming emails, extract the most significant clues and combine the probabilities to produce an overall rating of "spamminess". |
Content-based trainable filters against Blacklist-Based
|
Arovax NoSpam is trainable. Some users avoid trainable spam filters, because they believe that training is a long and tiresome process, which leads to filtering based on obscure and fuzzy criteria. These users prefer filters based on blacklists such as SpamCop, ORDB, DSBL, SPEWS, etc.
They are wrong due to two facts:
1) A blacklist is NOT an objective criteria. Let's take a look at how a typical blacklist operates. Say, there's some web hosting company that sells email services. And say, there's some client who decides one day to send out a bunch of spams to a lot of addresses. Some of these might get submitted to a blacklist as spam. What happens is the web host's IP address or a group of IP addresses gets blacklisted. As a result, you stop receiving legitimate correspondence from this network, which is quite probably located in your own city.
Of course you can find excuses like: it was a bad web hosting company or it had bad clients. Well, that might be true, but it’s not the point. While the “bad software company” investigates that the problem was in a single “bad” client, a whole bunch of good and innocent clients would suffer. Is that objective enough? We don't think so.
2) Statistics-based criteria IS objective. Roughly, a statistics-based filter analyses each word that it finds in an email and compares it to the entry of the same word in its database, where there's a spam coefficient for it. The word-based approach has had a number of poor implementations, which might have spoiled the perception of this method. These filters came with a number of pre-defined words/coefficients and raised the spam probability of a message by simply incrementing a spam score of the message. The items that increased the spam score could be unsubscribe instructions, non-white HTML backgrounds or such words as "free" or "spam". These filters were known as "newsletter killers", because if there are two things that are present in most legitimate newsletters, this would be unsubscribe instructions and ads for free giveaways. Newsletter publishers went mad and started using tricks to fool these filters by typing "sp*m" or "fre*e". Well, that is subjective, but there's a great difference in how Arovax NoSpam works.
First, the formula that calculates the total spam score is not that simple (not linear). It does not work by simply adding up the coefficients or increasing a spam score, but deploys other criteria such as the overall message size. E.g. if there's a dozen of spam words in a long email about cooking, Arovax NoSpam will not mark it as spam.
Second, Arovax NoSpam is trainable. Not configurable, but trainable. That is you cannot tune the coefficients manually, but you can only submit a full message for training. This ensures objectivity by avoiding human errors and also means that your statistical coefficients are based on your personal email.
Both of the above ensure that Arovax NoSpam's approach is objective and is capable of providing great results.
|
|
 |
| |
Get the emails you want and nothing else! With its advanced Learning Filter, Arovax NoSpam quickly and easily helps you stop spam from polluting your inbox . The filter also known as Bayesian Filter uses the rules of Thomas Bayes (English mathematician, 18th century) and calculates a certain Spam-Probability for each e-mail message .
This filter can be trained! So in a short time it will know your messages even better than you, hence the recognition rate will rapidly increase.
Read more >> |
Self-learning ability ensures that its knowledge base is always
up-to-date no matter how spam changes. Repeated lab tests and user experience
prove Arovax NoSpam can successfully block over 99%
spam with virtually no false positive.
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
|
|
| |
I have now been using Arovax NoSpam for 7 days, I used many Spam filters in the past, all were Shareware and all were registered, I could name names but that would be unethical, however none of them have so far ever compared to Arovax NoSpam which is doing exactly what I expected.
Gary C Moore
Florida , US |
|
| |
|
 |
 |
|
|
| |
I switched to Arovax NoSpam. Other Spam fighters did not reply to my questions or solve my problems in time. They offered me answers to my questions 2 weeks after I had already... removed their software from my computer! I had very pleasant experience with Arovax Helpdesk. They are attentive, quick and problem-solving.
Well done and please keep up the great work!
Cornelia Retherford
Toronto , CA |
|
| |
|
 |
 |
|
|
| |
This product works really well. It creates a SPAM folder in Outlook and directs spam into this folder that you have to empty out every so often. I installed this onto our client systems who had requested us to help with incoming spam and they haven't had a single complaint since... That's also when I convinced them to stop using MS Outlook Express (Archaic!) and get up to date with MS Outlook. The only thing you have to look out for is the mail you NEED in the spam folder. Just go into the SPAM folder and "Add to friends" it to include to the safe senders list. Thumbs Up!
Roger Galiano
Texas , US |
|
| |
|
 |
|
|